Wireless_Within constructs an environment in which nature recordings and malfunctioning electronics cease to behave like opposites. Philip Samartzis brings field recordings, computer processing, and an installation artist’s sensitivity to acoustic space. Günter Müller contributes electronics, stored sounds, and the residual rhythmic instincts of a percussionist who had gradually transformed drums and cymbals into digital signal. Andy Guhl and Norbert Möslang operate Voice Crack’s “cracked everyday electronics,” activating broken devices, exposed circuits, radios, cables, switches, and consumer technology removed from its intended purpose. Across three long pieces, these elements do not form a conventional quartet with clearly separated voices. They become one unstable ecosystem where insects may be electrical, circuitry appears alive, and a distant human voice can feel less familiar than a burst of static.
The session took place in Melbourne during July 2002, one day after the musicians visited a rainforest in South Australia. That excursion did not produce a literal nature album, but it seems to have changed the scale at which the electronics were heard. A rainforest is filled with overlapping systems whose individual sources are often invisible. Birds, insects, leaves, water, wind, and distant animals occupy different frequencies without arranging themselves for an audience. Voice Crack’s sputters and short-circuits enter Samartzis’s environmental recordings in much the same manner. Instead of dominating the landscape as technological intrusions, they behave like another population communicating through chirps, pulses, friction, and irregular repetition.
“Tombac Toothless” opens with small signals appearing inside a broad field. Birdlike sounds, faint crackles, low vibrations, and electronic flickers establish several depths at once. Nothing remains clearly foregrounded for long. A sound may arrive close to the listener, then be absorbed into a larger atmosphere whose dimensions are difficult to measure. The title joins a metallic alloy with the absence of teeth, suggesting a material capable of hardness but deprived of its ordinary means of biting. The piece possesses that restrained tension. Its electronics scratch, hum, and gather pressure, yet aggression is continually softened by distance, processing, and the surrounding environmental space.
Voice Crack had spent decades learning how to make ordinary electronic objects reveal unauthorized behavior. Guhl and Möslang did not treat damaged technology merely as a source of novelty. Their cracked electronics exposed the instability hidden inside appliances designed to appear reliable and obedient. A radio, circuit board, toy, or cable normally conceals its internal processes behind a finished function. Voice Crack opened those objects and listened to everything manufacturers had intended users to ignore: feedback, interference, electrical leakage, unstable contact, and the noises produced when a device no longer knows what task it is supposed to perform.
Samartzis places those unruly signals inside a carefully considered spatial composition. His role extended beyond contributing sounds during the original session. He later spent considerable time editing the recordings, removing roughly half of the quartet’s activity and reorganizing what remained. That reduction is central to the album’s character. Improvisers naturally produce material by responding in real time, but a microphone preserves every response whether or not it remains necessary afterward. Samartzis treated the session as raw substance rather than sacred evidence. By subtracting layers, he allowed individual electrical events to retain air around them and transformed collective improvisation into something closer to electroacoustic composition.
“Bacchus Marsh” is more diffuse and atmospheric, its title referring to a landscape northwest of Melbourne rather than the classical god suggested by “Bacchus.” The piece feels geographically open. Electronics drift across a field containing faint environmental activity, with pulses and granular movements appearing at uncertain distances. Instead of building toward impact, the quartet allows textures to hover, recede, and reappear in altered form. The music can resemble weather passing over hidden machinery or a transmission received from a location where biological and electrical life have evolved together.
Müller is particularly important to this sense of continuity. Although his instruments included digital storage and electronics, his background in percussion gave him an unusual understanding of attack, decay, and the placement of events in time. He does not need to establish a beat for his contributions to feel rhythmic. A low pulse, soft burst, or trembling layer can regulate the movement of an entire passage. His sounds often function as connective tissue between Samartzis’s broad environments and Voice Crack’s sharper electrical fragments, preventing the album from dividing into field recording beneath improvised noise.
The title Wireless_Within describes an invisible network operating inside both the music and the listening body. Wireless transmission appears immaterial, yet it depends upon physical devices, electrical energy, antennas, atmosphere, and receivers capable of converting signals back into audible form. The album makes these hidden exchanges perceptible. Sounds arrive without revealing their sources, cross one another, disappear, and return from another apparent location. The listener becomes a receiver attempting to determine which transmissions belong to the environment, which were produced by machines, and which may be perceptual patterns created by the ear itself.
“Bleep Block” introduces more obvious digital activity, stutters, sine-like tones, street sounds, and distant children’s voices. The human presence is striking because it arrives without becoming the center. Voices drift through the electronics like memories from another location, recognizable enough to suggest ordinary social life but too remote to provide narrative explanation. The quartet’s signals seem to occupy the same public air as conversation, traffic, play, and urban movement. Technology is not sealed inside a laboratory. It is already woven through daily experience, carrying fragments of people who may never know their sounds entered an experimental composition.
The piece begins and ends around a sustained electronic tone, giving its irregular internal activity a loose circular structure. Between those points, the music becomes busier and more fragmented than the first two tracks. New signals enter rapidly, interrupting one another before stable relationships can form. This restlessness gives “Bleep Block” the character of an overloaded communication system where too many transmissions are competing for limited space. The apparent block is not silence but congestion.
Wireless_Within also carries historical weight as one of Voice Crack’s final documents. Guhl and Möslang separated shortly after the Australian sessions, ending a partnership that had begun in the 1970s and helped establish cracked electronics as a distinct improvisational language. Their work had travelled from acoustic free improvisation into amplified junk, damaged consumer devices, installations, collaborations with Borbetomagus, and the electroacoustic quartet poire_z. This album does not sound like a ceremonial farewell because nobody appears to be summarizing the past. Voice Crack remains curious, responsive, and willing to let another artist radically reshape the session.
That absence of finality makes the recording more affecting. The duo’s history does not conclude with a dramatic statement or collapse into retrospective grandeur. It disperses into birds, children, static, low pulses, and half-recognizable transmissions. Their electronics enter Samartzis’s larger environment and lose their ownership, becoming part of a soundscape that may continue after the performers have left.
The album’s deepest pleasure lies in its uncertainty. It continually asks whether a sound is natural, mechanical, recorded, synthesized, accidental, or carefully edited, then demonstrates that these distinctions may matter less than the relationships created among them. A rainforest and a broken circuit are both systems containing hidden activity. An insect and an electronic oscillator can produce similarly persistent frequencies. Human beings move through both environments, listening selectively while surrounded by signals beyond their awareness.
Wireless_Within makes that surrounding activity temporarily audible. It is not a portrait of untouched nature invaded by machines, nor a celebration of technology replacing the organic world. It presents a hybrid habitat that already exists, filled with electricity, memory, weather, damaged objects, distant voices, and transmissions passing through bodies without permission. Samartzis, Müller, Guhl, and Möslang do not attempt to control the habitat completely. They enter it, remove enough noise for its internal pathways to become visible, and allow the wireless world within ordinary experience to begin speaking in its own cracked language.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi.