Boodlers begins with three musicians entering a room, but it does not remain a document of what happened there. The basic performances were recorded live to DAT at Baby Monster in New York, after which Elliott Sharp digitally edited and remixed the material at his Studio zOaR. That combination is central to the album’s identity. Fred Chalenor’s bass and Henry Franzoni’s drums supply the unstable physical chemistry of musicians responding in real time, while Sharp’s guitar, tenor saxophone and computer work allow the performances to be cut open, rearranged and occasionally returned in altered shapes. Improvisation becomes raw material without losing the friction of the original encounter.
The trio’s name supplies the first clue to its humor. A “boodler” is an old American term for a political grafter, someone participating in bribery, patronage or the distribution of illicit money. Nearly every track title continues the language of politics, commerce or corrupt exchange: “Acid-Jazz Payback,” “Green Party,” “Buckshot,” “Boodlerama” and “Cache Cow.” The album never develops this into a literal political program, but the titles make its playful distrust of fashionable categories and respectable institutions clear. Even the music seems to operate through unauthorized transactions. Rhythms are borrowed and damaged, jazz gestures are passed through rock amplification, and live playing is fed into digital machinery that returns it carrying a different identity.
Sharp was an ideal musician to bring into Fred Chalenor and Henry Franzoni’s long-running partnership. Chalenor and Franzoni had played together in various forms since the 1970s, most notably in Face Ditch and later Caveman Shoestore. Their connection was not simply the conventional relationship of bassist supporting drummer. They had developed a shared rhythmic language built from abrupt turns, crooked meters, heavy grooves and the ability to change direction without stopping to announce the new destination. Sharp enters that language as both provocateur and engineer. His guitar can lock into the rhythm section’s momentum, cut across it with hard angular figures or abandon rock articulation for metallic scraping and electronic grain. His tenor saxophone introduces another physical register, able to behave as melody, rhythmic punctuation or a rough-edged competing voice.
“Acid-Jazz Payback” immediately tests the fashionable language of its moment. By 1995, acid jazz had become a recognizable mixture of funk rhythm, jazz reference, dance-floor polish and cosmopolitan cool. Boodlers retain the promise of groove but remove the polish that would make it useful as lifestyle music. Chalenor and Franzoni establish movement without granting the listener a smooth, dependable pocket. Sharp’s lines repeatedly roughen the surface, turning the track into a revenge fantasy against jazz reduced to tasteful atmosphere. The title’s “payback” may be humorous, but the performance does sound as though improvisation has returned to collect a debt from a style that borrowed its vocabulary while sanding away much of its danger.
Chalenor is crucial to the piece because he does not treat bass as neutral flooring. His playing is thick, active and capable of redirecting the group through a small shift of emphasis. Franzoni answers with percussion that can suggest funk for a few seconds before opening into freer motion. Sharp does not float above them as a featured soloist. He enters the mechanism, sometimes reinforcing it and sometimes throwing irregular objects into its gears. The result is recognizably rhythmic but resistant to passive consumption.
“Green Party” lasts less than two minutes and behaves like a compressed interruption. The title may suggest environmental politics, money or simply the color of American currency, but the music is too brief to establish a stable platform. It demonstrates how effectively the trio can work in miniature after the extended opening. Ideas arrive, collide and disappear before any one of them can become the piece’s official policy. The abrupt scale change also prevents the album from settling into the expectation that every improvisation must become a long-form excursion.
“Buckshot” returns to a larger field. A contemporary review observed that the three musicians sometimes appear to be improvising independently, each operating within his own terrain, while the total performance somehow remains coherent. That description identifies one of the album’s greatest strengths. Unity does not require constant agreement. Sharp, Chalenor and Franzoni can pursue separate trajectories because they are listening not only for opportunities to imitate one another but for ways their differences might create a larger structure.
The title describes the piece accurately. Buckshot disperses rather than following a single line. Individual attacks spread across the stereo field, and the listener must decide whether to follow the bass, percussion or Sharp’s rapidly changing instrumental gestures. The performance remains cohesive because the musicians share an instinct for density. When one player occupies more space, another can reduce activity or move into a different register. What sounds initially like collision gradually reveals itself as traffic managed without signs.
“Cambionics” introduces the album’s most obvious transformation through computer processing. A cambion, in folklore, is a hybrid offspring joining human and demonic parentage; “Cambionics” sounds like an invented science devoted to producing such crossings. Whatever Sharp intended by the title, the music’s method is hybridization. The trio remains audible, but live instrumental identities are stretched, layered or altered until their origins become uncertain. Drums no longer behave exclusively as percussion, guitar loses the familiar outline of plucked strings, and ensemble interaction becomes something that can occur after the musicians have finished playing.
This use of computer editing does not replace improvisation with laboratory perfection. Sharp preserves the nervous movement of the trio while making the recording itself an additional performer. The computer remembers, repeats and mutates pieces of the session. Instead of documenting one irreversible passage through time, the track permits sounds to encounter distorted versions of their own past. The result belongs equally to free improvisation and electroacoustic composition, though it carries the dirt, humor and bodily force that those terms can sometimes leave out.
The twenty-minute “Boodlerama” forms the album’s sprawling center of gravity. Its title suggests a panoramic exhibition of the group’s methods, and the performance moves through multiple territories without attempting to disguise the transitions as conventional composition. Groove, psychedelic drift, abstract texture, free-jazz agitation and computer-treated sound appear as temporary districts inside one unstable city. The length allows small ideas to become environments, but it also gives the trio room to abandon them before they harden into routines.
“Boodlerama” is where the history between Chalenor and Franzoni becomes especially valuable. Long improvisations often reveal whether a rhythm section merely accompanies adventurous playing or possesses an independent imagination. These two can support Sharp without waiting for instructions, but they can also initiate changes and force him to respond. Chalenor’s bass may provide a distorted central mass, then suddenly become wiry and mobile. Franzoni can move from propulsion toward scattered percussion without making the music sound emptied out. Sharp alternates between being the trio’s sharpest edge and another fragment inside its collective machinery.
The piece also explains why descriptions of Boodlers vary so widely. The group can be called avant-jazz, experimental rock, free improvisation, psychedelic music or computer-processed noise, and each description will be temporarily correct. The problem begins when any one label is expected to govern the entire performance. Boodlers do not fuse genres into a polished new product. They allow incompatible methods to remain visible while discovering how quickly the musicians can travel among them.
“Cache Cow” closes the album with another compressed joke. The title replaces the “cash” in cash cow with the computer memory term “cache,” joining commerce to data storage. It is an appropriate conclusion for music that began as a live event and was then stored, edited and reconfigured digitally. The spontaneous performance has become information that can be retrieved and transformed, yet the short track refuses to inflate that process into technological solemnity. The album leaves with a grin, carrying its accumulated noise away before the listener can decide whether a final grand statement is coming.
Boodlers appeared at a fertile midpoint in 1990s experimental music. Alternative rock had created a larger audience for dissonance and unconventional instrumental sound, acid jazz and electronic dance culture were reorganizing older grooves, and increasingly accessible digital tools were changing what could happen after a studio performance. Sharp, Chalenor and Franzoni occupy all of these developments without submitting fully to any of them. They can sound like a particularly damaged power trio, a free-jazz unit, a mutant funk band or a computer-composition workshop, sometimes within the same passage.
The album’s production preserves this ambiguity. Recording live to DAT captures the clarity and immediacy of the players’ reactions, while Sharp’s later intervention rejects the idea that a live improvisation must be protected as a sacred, untouched event. Editing becomes another form of improvisation performed at a different speed. In the studio, Sharp can answer a gesture days or weeks after Chalenor and Franzoni originally made it, constructing new relationships that were unavailable in the room.
There is an important generosity inside this method. Although Sharp was the most internationally recognizable name and controlled the later computer work, the album never reduces Chalenor and Franzoni to anonymous source material. Their rhythmic personalities survive every transformation. The computer does not erase the human encounter; it reveals further possibilities concealed within it. This is why the record feels less like an Elliott Sharp solo project with accompaniment than the beginning of an actual group. Boodlers would continue and release Counter Fit two years later, expanding the concept rather than treating this meeting as a disposable session.
The record’s humor should not be underestimated either. Experimental music is frequently presented as though seriousness requires solemnity, but Boodlers understand that complexity can laugh at itself. The titles puncture intellectual grandeur, while the playing repeatedly turns apparent disorder into a sudden groove or dismantles a successful pattern just when it begins sounding impressive. The musicians do not trivialize their abilities. They refuse to treat virtuosity as a formal ceremony.
Boodlers ultimately documents three different relationships to instability. Sharp approaches it through fractured instrumental language, systems, processing and the pleasure of transforming known sounds. Chalenor approaches it through bass lines that can anchor a passage while quietly moving its foundations. Franzoni approaches it through percussion that recognizes rhythm as a field of possibilities rather than a fixed grid. Their methods overlap without becoming identical.
The album is therefore not chaotic in the sense of lacking order. It contains several kinds of order competing, cooperating and occasionally bribing one another. Every track proposes a different temporary government, from the corrupted dance floor of “Acid-Jazz Payback” to the dispersed negotiations of “Buckshot,” the digital hybrid of “Cambionics” and the unruly twenty-minute municipality of “Boodlerama.” Nothing remains in power for long. That may be the boodlers’ real platform: every structure is provisional, every rhythm open to revision, and every apparently stable system already contains the material of its next mutation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi.