Judgement begins at a distance, with weather and urban sound flattened into a cold, uncertain surface. For several minutes it can feel as though the recorder has simply been left somewhere exposed, listening while rain, wind, traffic, and the city’s electrical nervous system pass through it. Gradually, however, the recording begins to feel less stationary. A person is moving inside this sound. The microphone is not observing the weather from shelter; it is being carried into it.
That movement changes everything. Wind striking a microphone is often treated as a technical failure, something to be removed with a shield, filter, edit, or apology. Gabi Losoncy allows it to become one of the record’s primary forces. The air does not merely surround the recording. It attacks the recording process itself, pushing the microphone beyond its ability to represent the world cleanly. The resulting distortion makes the weather feel physical, not as an image of a storm but as pressure applied directly to the listener’s ears.
This gives Judgement a quality closer to an ordeal than a picturesque field recording. There is no scenic panorama and little stable sense of location. Traffic, voices, horns, sirens, and indistinct public announcements surface and disappear before they can be organized into a clear story. The city remains recognizable but unreadable. Something may be happening nearby, perhaps an emergency, a gathering, routine street control, or merely several unrelated events colliding acoustically. Losoncy does not supply enough information to settle the matter.
The title quietly places responsibility for that uncertainty onto the listener. We begin making judgments almost immediately. We decide whether the weather is dangerous, whether the voices sound frightened, whether the sirens indicate crisis, whether the microphone distortion is intentional, and whether Losoncy is walking toward something or trying to get away from it. None of these conclusions can be confirmed. The album reveals how quickly hearing becomes interpretation and how quickly interpretation hardens into belief.
That process is especially noticeable when human voices enter. Speech usually promises explanation, but here it often remains too distant or partially buried to clarify anything. A voice amplified through what sounds like a megaphone carries authority without delivering fully understandable content. We hear the shape of instruction before we understand the instruction itself. It becomes another environmental pressure, related to the wind and traffic: language functioning as force.
Losoncy seems interested in the moment when ordinary surroundings stop feeling neutral. A wet street, passing vehicles, metal fixtures, and public voices are all common parts of city life, but their combination here creates a state of exposure. The recording never settles into a comfortable background. Even when relatively little is happening, the possibility of interruption remains active. The listener becomes alert to every approaching engine, every rise in wind, and every distant human signal.
Late in the piece, a loose metallic sound begins striking or scraping against another surface. It might be a rope or cable moving against a pole, a fence flexing in the weather, or some similar piece of unattended infrastructure. Whatever its source, it produces the closest thing the record has to an instrumental performance. The wind activates the object, the object answers the wind, and Losoncy records the exchange. No performer needs to impose a rhythm because the environment has already generated one.
The rhythm is unstable, however. It does not repeat neatly enough to become reassuring. Each impact arrives according to shifting pressure rather than a measurable beat. The metal appears almost animate, ringing out from an empty space while the larger city continues behind it. By leaving the source uncertain, Losoncy permits the sound to hover between object, instrument, warning signal, and accidental bell.
Her artwork seems to echo this uncertainty. The cover resembles a rough diagram of roads, barriers, structures, or movement through an urban landscape, drawn in luminous strokes against darkness. It does not provide a literal map, but it carries the sensation of attempting to map an experience after passing through it. Lines cross, bend, and disappear. A small white figure or mark seems stranded inside a much larger system.
Judgement is sometimes described as a field recording, but that term feels too peaceful and orderly for what Losoncy accomplishes. A “field” suggests a location available for study, while this recording sounds like a location refusing to hold still. The weather changes the microphone, movement changes the perspective, public events intrude, and the listener’s own assumptions continually alter the perceived meaning. There is no clean separation between observer and environment.
That may be one of the central developments in Losoncy’s work during this period. In Didn’t Take Much, she recorded herself inside an institution that was interpreting her body. On Judgement, she enters a public environment that cannot be interpreted with the same apparent certainty. There are no medical readings, direct questions, or professional conclusions. There is only raw exposure and the mind’s attempt to decide what it means.
The record’s length is important. At nearly forty-three uninterrupted minutes, it lasts long enough for initial curiosity to become physical involvement. The wind can become tiring. The ambiguity can become uncomfortable. The metallic impacts can begin occupying the imagination. Losoncy does not compress the walk into highlights because compression would turn it into a story about the experience rather than the experience of remaining inside it.
The recording also raises questions about authorship. Losoncy did not create the rain, direct the traffic, order the sirens, or conduct the wind-driven metal. Yet the work would not exist without her decision to enter this environment, keep recording, and preserve its duration. She is both witness and participant, composer and person being acted upon. Her authorship lies in recognizing that these events form a complete work when carried together.
The RUTracker copy adds another layer of uncertain movement. A small Canadian CDr release became a digital transfer, entered a Russian file-sharing network, and eventually reached this archive without bringing its complete technical history along. We do not know whose disc was used, what drive extracted it, or what happened between the original object and these FLAC files. Like the album itself, the transfer arrives bearing strong evidence of a journey but no fully legible map.
That missing information does not make the copy meaningless. It makes the anonymous custodian part of the work’s continuing life. Someone thought this obscure recording mattered enough to preserve, identify, and seed for strangers. The music crossed languages and borders through a system built from fragments of trust: filenames, checksums, comments, tags, and the hope that another person would keep sharing after the original seeder disappeared.
Judgement therefore continues beyond the forty-three minutes captured by Losoncy. It exists in the decision to record an exposed walk, Caduc’s decision to manufacture the CDr, an unknown listener’s decision to rip it, RUTracker’s decision to retain it, and this archive’s decision to present it again. Each stage requires judgment about what deserves survival.
Listeners who recognize the location, the public event, the metallic object, or the source of this particular transfer may be able to restore pieces of its hidden geography. Until then, the record remains suspended between documentation and dream: a person moving through hostile air while the city speaks in signals too incomplete to obey.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi.