Zettai Reido’s III 1981-1982 is not simply an archival collection of another obscure Japanese post-punk band. It documents a band changing its internal rules while almost disappearing from history in the process. The group had formed in 1979 and built an early reputation around a chaotic, confrontational sound that sat somewhere inside Tokyo’s punk, post-punk and experimental underground. By 1981 that version of Zettai Reido was effectively collapsing. Guitarist Teruo Sasayama left after a Kansai tour in March, and the band’s earlier configuration fell apart. Yet only a couple of months later a new three-piece version emerged with Shinya Kimura, Ichiro Nakagawa and Toru Sakaguchi. That restart is the world captured here. Instead of attempting to recreate the earlier band, the remaining musicians pushed toward songs, poetry, psychedelic rock and a stranger form of pop, while still retaining the tension and independence that had made Zettai Reido difficult to categorize in the first place.
The 2013 Super Fuji double-CD finally gathered this 1981-82 period more than thirty years after the music was made. Disc one carries fourteen studio recordings under the title SONGS / a reward of vanity. These were not casual demos left in a rehearsal room. EMI had shown renewed interest in the band, and Zettai Reido began recording material intended for a possible release. That album never appeared. By the time the sessions were taking shape, the Japanese underground was shifting again, with punk and rock and roll moving toward the center of attention, and the recordings simply remained unreleased. Zettai Reido itself faded away around May 1982. The music on disc one therefore has the peculiar quality of a lost album that was not rediscovered because it had been famous, but because somebody preserved the tapes long enough for another generation to hear what had disappeared.
What immediately separates this incarnation from the more abrasive early Zettai Reido is the importance of the song. Nakagawa has described the third-period lineup as consciously moving away from the punk, new wave and post-punk orientation of the previous version and trying to make something more pop-oriented, with original songs and poetry placed at the center. That does not mean conventional pop. The band’s sense of groove remains skewed, the arrangements retain an experimental looseness, and melody often seems to be floating through an unstable environment rather than sitting comfortably on top of a rhythm section. The change is more fundamental than simply becoming softer. The musicians are asking how far their own vocabulary can stretch without becoming somebody else’s music.
That is especially interesting because Zettai Reido had already defined itself through refusal. Contemporary descriptions of the group repeatedly return to statements such as not wanting to be absorbed by “music,” not aiming toward anything, not setting traps or strategies, and wanting to make “zero” or “worthless” music. Those phrases sound almost aggressively anti-careerist, but III reveals that refusal did not mean refusing melody or beauty. If anything, this period makes the band more difficult to classify because recognizable song structures begin appearing without the group surrendering its basic distrust of musical convention. A pop melody might emerge, but the surrounding rhythm can remain peculiar. A poetic vocal can sit over something psychedelic and almost weightless. A groove can feel warm and strangely inviting while still refusing the predictable emotional payoff of mainstream rock.
The circumstances of the recordings make that shift even more intimate. Nakagawa has recalled that the three musicians effectively reorganized their lives around the band during this period. An apartment next to Kimura’s became vacant near Chitose-Karasuyama Station, and Nakagawa and Sakaguchi moved into it, creating a situation where everyday life and music-making overlapped. They used Sakaguchi’s mixer, Kimura’s cassette deck and other modest equipment to experiment with multitracking and arrangement. That homemade process matters because the music does not feel like musicians waiting for a proper studio to become themselves. The work was happening continuously. Songs, rehearsals, recording experiments and daily life were all part of the same environment.
The surviving titles from this period reinforce that sense of inwardness and poetry. “月の屋根の下” translates as “Under the Roof of the Moon,” while “祈りの朝” is “Morning of Prayer,” with the subtitle referring to Hancamanca, Kimura’s cat. Another surviving song, “キャラメルソング,” is simply “Caramel Song.” These titles sit very far from the blunt aggression associated with punk naming. They suggest domestic images, private symbols and small surreal turns rather than slogans. Even when the music retains tension, the language opens windows into something more personal and dreamlike.
Disc two changes the perspective completely. Instead of presenting the band in the controlled environment of studio work, it gathers live recordings, including eight tracks from the legendary “Cabaret Gig” on Yokosuka’s Dobuita Street. That event has acquired its own underground mythology because of the breadth of bands passing through the series, including groups such as Jagatara and others from the surrounding Tokyo experimental and punk network. Zettai Reido appeared there during this three-piece phase, and the surviving cassette recording later became part of III. The live material is crucial because it proves the softer or more song-oriented direction was not merely a private studio experiment. This version of the band could carry the new material into a room and make it physically work.
The contrast between the two discs is therefore more than studio versus live. Disc one shows composition being shaped and preserved. Disc two shows those ideas entering unstable space, where tempo, room acoustics, audience presence and performance pressure alter them. Zettai Reido’s music benefits from that instability. The studio songs can feel carefully assembled without becoming polished, while the live recordings expose the rhythmic and textural edges more aggressively. Hearing both sides of the same period makes the collection feel less like a simple archival dump and more like a document of a band trying to discover what its new identity actually was.
There is also something deeply appropriate about this music being preserved through imperfect means. The group’s early history was built around small venues, independent labels, cassette recordings, homemade systems and scenes that were never designed with long-term archival survival in mind. The 1981-82 recordings were not sitting in a major-label vault waiting for a deluxe edition. They survived because individual people kept them. Sakaguchi in particular is credited by Nakagawa with preserving the material and helping make the 2013 release possible. That act of preservation changes the historical meaning of III. Without those tapes, this version of Zettai Reido would have existed primarily as memory.
The collection also corrects the common tendency to freeze underground bands at the moment that first made them interesting. Zettai Reido’s 1980 material is easier to slot into the story of Japanese post-punk. It is jagged, chaotic and connected to a recognizable underground moment. III refuses that neat ending. The band did not simply become “more mature” or “more accessible.” It mutated. The departure of members, addition of Sakaguchi, shift toward songwriting, flirtation with EMI, experiments in home multitracking and later live performances all create a second identity that deserves to be heard on its own terms.
That makes the subtitle 1981-1982 especially important. These are not merely dates attached for archival precision. They describe a tiny window in which one version of Zettai Reido existed, developed rapidly and then disappeared. From May 1981 to roughly March or May 1982, three musicians were building a private little musical universe that almost completely vanished when the band dissolved. Thirty-one years later, Super Fuji finally turned that lost period into a physical release.
III therefore feels less like a reissue than the delayed arrival of something that never got to arrive the first time. The first disc contains the unrealized studio album. The second contains evidence of the band functioning in public. Together they show a group refusing to remain trapped inside the sound that had initially defined it. Punk gives way to psychedelic pop, poetry enters more forcefully, grooves become stranger and warmer, and the idea of “zero” music somehow begins producing songs with genuine emotional weight.
The most fascinating thing is that none of this sounds like a calculated reinvention. The band was not chasing a new audience or trying to become fashionable. The evidence suggests the opposite. Zettai Reido kept changing because remaining fixed would have violated the same independence that created the band in the first place.
Then, almost immediately, they were gone.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi.