The first cassette feels impatient. Two sides, barely fifteen minutes combined, and Blind Date keeps the sound moving as though there is not enough tape available to let anything settle. Side A begins already occupied, with a heavy repeating underside and a rough electronic mass pushing against it. There is no long approach. During the opening couple of minutes the lower movement grows increasingly dominant, but sharper activity keeps appearing above it, sometimes only for seconds before another layer wipes across it. Around the three-minute area the recording briefly opens up and becomes harsher and more exposed, then folds back into its heavier form. Similar changes keep happening without behaving like neat edits. Something gives way, another part becomes visible, and the piece continues from the new configuration.
What distinguishes the side is how bodily the repetition becomes. The underlying movements are regular enough that the ear starts predicting their return, but never clean enough to become rhythm in any comfortable sense. Each cycle arrives carrying distortion, extra grit, some small difference in shape. Late in the side, especially around the final minute, the sound becomes more agitated again. The large low body loosens just enough for harsher edges to push through before everything stops. Seven and a half minutes feels almost breathless.
Side B initially appears to step away from that force. The opening is unusually subdued, with a low signal sitting far back and very little surrounding it. For a few seconds it is possible to wonder whether the second side is going to remain nearly empty. Then, within the first minute, the recording abruptly acquires weight. The difference is dramatic because Blind Date does not slowly fade the piece in. Something catches and suddenly the mechanism is operating.
From there, Side B is more erratic than the first. It moves between deep repeated motion and brighter, much harsher passages, with several stretches where the upper abrasion seems to tear loose from whatever was holding it down. Around two to four minutes the recording is particularly restless. The deepest material repeatedly withdraws, leaving a sharper grind exposed, then returns underneath it. By the latter half, the sound has become increasingly splintered. Instead of Side A’s sense of one large body being continually reshaped, this side feels as though individual pieces are fighting over what the foreground is supposed to be.
That first cassette could almost stand alone: one side arrives fully formed, the other has to switch itself on. Then the second cassette changes the scale of the project completely.
Side C lasts thirteen minutes and begins closer to nothing than anything heard so far. The first minute is genuinely restrained. A faint electronic presence hangs in the background, then slowly gains substance. During the second minute the increase becomes obvious, and by about three minutes the track has grown into a huge low-moving structure. Because Blind Date takes several minutes to arrive there, the eventual weight feels earned rather than simply imposed.
The long middle section behaves almost like a series of tides. A deep mass takes over, weakens, exposes rougher material above it and then returns. Around four and a half minutes there is a substantial thinning, followed by another rebuilding. Six minutes brings another shift. Eight minutes finds the lower movement enormous again. These are not arbitrary changes pasted together. The piece seems to keep testing how much can be removed before the listener stops hearing the same object, then putting enough back to make the connection recognizable again.
By ten minutes, the balance has begun changing more noticeably. Harsher material becomes increasingly visible through the lower movement, particularly during the final couple of minutes. The side that began almost empty and became massive does not simply end at maximum size. It gradually exposes its internal components again. Thirteen minutes gives Blind Date enough time to make those returns feel like memory. Something heard several minutes earlier reappears and sounds familiar even though its surroundings have completely changed.
Side D begins without Side C’s long awakening. There is already substantial motion, with deep activity underneath a harsher surface, and for the first several minutes it feels like the most self-assured part of the set. Different layers keep shifting position, but the overall mechanism seems capable of maintaining itself.
Then at roughly five minutes it nearly disappears.
The drop is startling. Much of the force drains out over a very short period, leaving a weak, exposed stretch where the recording seems suddenly deprived of whatever had been driving it. After forty minutes of repeatedly hearing noise survive transformation, this feels different. For a moment it sounds genuinely interrupted.
Around six minutes the system returns.
The recovery is immediate enough to make the gap feel structural rather than accidental, but what follows does not simply resume the first half. The rebuilt version is heavier and increasingly committed to its lower movement. Through seven, eight, nine and ten minutes, the side regains substantial force while continually shifting downward. By the final several minutes, the bass has become overwhelming. The harsher material that previously competed for attention is still present, but it increasingly rides on top of a huge slow foundation. Near the end, that foundation becomes almost absurdly dominant, as though the entire forty-minute set has finally settled into the deepest thing it could find.
Then it runs out.
The unequal cassettes are what make the whole set interesting. The first gives Blind Date no time for patience, so every transformation feels compressed and combative. The second allows the same basic vocabulary to stretch, disappear, return and change meaning over much longer spans. A three-second reduction on cassette one feels like an edit. A minute of reduction on cassette two feels like a place.
The physical set reinforces that expansion simply by existing as two objects. There are multiple panels, photographs and cassette surfaces rather than one image pretending to summarize forty minutes of sound. You finish the short first tape, remove it, and then discover that the second object is going to ask for a completely different amount of time. The interruption between the cassettes becomes useful. It separates urgency from duration.
Compared with the earlier Blind Date tape in this Dead Gods group, this feels far less interested in maintaining one concentrated attack. The raw materials are recognizable, but here Tyler Keen lets them occupy radically different amounts of time. The second cassette especially points toward the dynamic quality later descriptions of Blind Date emphasize: heavy walls continually interrupted by static, feedback and abrupt changes rather than treated as immovable objects.
The first cassette fights the clock.
The second forgets the clock is there.
By the final side, everything has sunk below it.
—ChatGPT
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi.