| Vand'Oeuvre – 0529 226.34MB FLAC |
Thursday, May 22, 2025
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Monday, May 19, 2025
Saturday, May 17, 2025
Thursday, May 15, 2025
Oren Ambarchi / Johan Berthling / Andreas Werliin - 2022 - Ghosted
Drag City – none 189.33MB FLAC
Ghosted now exists twice in this archive, arriving through two separately packaged digital copies of the same album. That might look like accidental duplication, but few records are better equipped to defend it. Oren Ambarchi, Johan Berthling and Andreas Werliin build this music from repeated figures whose apparent sameness gradually breaks open under attention. A bass pattern returns, but the drum touching its edge has shifted. A guitar tone appears stationary, but its overtones are rotating. The listener enters what seems to be the same measure again and discovers that time has quietly changed its contents. Two copies of Ghosted therefore do not have to cancel one another. They can behave like two revolutions of the same groove: recognizably identical from a distance, individually marked by the route through which they arrived.
The trio recorded these pieces live, and that fact becomes more extraordinary as the music continues. Berthling often plays with the steadiness of a loop, yet the repetitions are being renewed by hand each time. Werliin avoids announcing complexity, placing drums, shakers and small percussive events so naturally that unusual meters pass through the body before the mind begins counting them. Ambarchi’s guitar rarely provides chords, riffs or solos in the expected sense. It becomes a band of light stretched above the rhythm, sometimes resembling organ, bowed string, electronic vapor or a signal whose transmitting device cannot be located. The record’s precision never feels corrected or sterilized because every stable pattern remains connected to three people listening in real time.
Christer Bothén’s donso n’goni gives the opening piece another circular voice. Its dry plucked tone meets Berthling’s double bass without settling into a simple division between African tradition and European experimentation. Bothén had already spent decades exploring how musical knowledge can travel without being flattened into decoration, including his important work with Don Cherry. Here the instrument is not placed in front of the trio as a guest exhibit. It enters the machinery of the groove, contributing to a shared wooden pulse while Ambarchi’s processed guitar floats above it. The result feels ancient and newly assembled at once, as though the music has found a recurring motion that existed before the musicians but still required these particular hands to make it audible.
The second and third pieces reduce the available materials even further. Berthling establishes figures that appear almost immovable, Werliin turns the empty areas around them into rhythm, and Ambarchi introduces tones whose movement occurs largely within their surfaces. Nothing progresses according to the usual promise that repetition must eventually be rewarded by a chorus, climax or dramatic rupture. The reward is increased perception. After several minutes, the listener begins noticing events that would have seemed insignificant in a busier arrangement: the depth added beneath an electric-bass harmonic, a drum accent changing the balance of a phrase, or the apparent speed of the guitar shifting as its processed tone revolves. The music does not withhold development. It relocates development into dimensions that hurried listening usually ignores.
This is also where separate digital copies become meaningful even before anyone stages a technical comparison between them. A file is not the music itself. It is one container through which the performance reaches another room. Different encoding, tagging, compression, source organization or playback circumstances can subtly change what the listener notices, while the intention of the person who preserved and shared that copy becomes part of its route. Even when two versions prove audibly indistinguishable, they remain separate archival objects. One may have been gathered from a lossless source and retained at greater size; another may have been reduced for easier movement. Each records a different decision about what should be carried forward and how much space that carrying should require.
“IV” loosens the album’s clockwork and allows the groove to dissolve into a dark afterimage. It is short enough to feel like a coda, yet essential enough that the preceding pieces would mean something different without it. The pulse disappears, but the body continues anticipating its return. This may be the album’s deepest form of ghosting: sound leaves while its timing remains behind. The title does not need literal spirits. These performances are full of traces, residual shapes and absent causes. A guitar stops but leaves a rotating field in the air. A repeated bass figure changes what silence means after it ends. The musicians withdraw, yet the listener’s nervous system continues performing a version of the piece without them.
That makes Ghosted an unusually fitting record to encounter more than once, through more than one copy, at more than one point in the archive. Duplication does not automatically mean redundancy any more than repetition means stagnation. The second appearance can reveal the first as an object with its own history rather than an invisible delivery system for interchangeable content. These four performances teach the ear that what appears unchanged may contain an entire population of differences. The two posts extend that lesson beyond the music. Same album, different package, different moment, different pathway into somebody’s life. The ghost has returned, but it has not returned empty-handed.
Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Oren Ambarchi Vs Ricardo Villalobos - 2016 - Hubris Variation
Black Truffle – BLACKTRUFFLE024D 557.64MB FLAC
The “versus” in Hubris Variation suggests a contest, but almost nothing here behaves competitively. Ricardo Villalobos does not attack Oren Ambarchi’s composition, overpower it with techno machinery or reduce its strange instrumental detail to raw material for a functional club track. He enters the repeating guitar network of Hubris, listens for the rhythmic system already concealed within it, and gradually makes that system visible. The result feels less like Ambarchi against Villalobos than one form of time passing through another. Palm-muted guitars become percussion, sustained harmonics become atmosphere, and a composition originally built through layered performance begins moving with the peculiar weightlessness of electronic music assembled from microscopic decisions.
Villalobos had already contributed to the original Hubris, which makes this return especially interesting. He is not being handed a finished object with no knowledge of its interior. He had previously occupied part of the machinery, adding electronics to an album where Ambarchi gathered guitar patterns, live drums, digital rhythm, synthesizers and several distinct musical personalities into one continuous rhythmic organism. Hubris Variation sounds like Villalobos revisiting that organism after everyone else has left the room. He removes much of its visible anatomy, studies the pulse still moving inside the remaining material, then constructs a new body around it.
Ambarchi’s clipped guitars are ideal material for this treatment because they already exist between melody and rhythm. A palm-muted note contains pitch, but its shortened attack also behaves like a struck object. Repeated quickly, the guitars can resemble several interlocking percussion instruments whose surfaces happen to carry harmonics. Villalobos magnifies that ambiguity. He does not simply place a kick drum beneath the guitar and declare it dance music. Small fragments are separated, repositioned and allowed to answer one another across the stereo field. What sounded like one mass of repeated strings begins dividing into gears, hinges, springs and rotating belts, all operating at slightly different depths.
The groove develops through implication. A conventional dance track often establishes its central pulse early, then creates movement by introducing or withdrawing elements around it. Hubris Variation seems to assemble the floor while the listener is already standing on it. A dry guitar strike suggests where a beat might belong; a low electronic pressure confirms part of that suggestion; a tiny percussive event appears beside it and changes the imagined shape of the measure. Each sound teaches the body how to understand the next one. By the time the track feels fully propulsive, the transition has already happened somewhere behind conscious attention. Villalobos has not announced the groove. He has allowed the listener’s nervous system to finish building it.
This produces a strange relationship between precision and looseness. Individual events are positioned with extraordinary care, yet the whole piece shuffles rather than marches. Sounds lean forward, arrive late, or seem to hover beside the pulse without ever losing contact with it. The rhythm has the flexibility of musicians listening to one another even though much of its final form is the result of electronic editing. That tension is central to Villalobos’s strongest work. Technology is not used to eliminate human instability. It becomes a tool for examining instability at a finer scale, revealing how a fraction of delay or a tiny shift in emphasis can make a repeated pattern feel doubtful, playful, impatient or deeply relaxed.
The twenty-seven-minute duration allows this uncertainty to become inhabitable. Hubris Variation does not need to hurry toward a drop because the entire piece is already dropping through itself, descending from one layer of repetition into another. Guitar figures that first seem central gradually become environmental. Percussive details move forward, then disappear into the larger mechanism. Low frequencies thicken the floor without sealing it shut, while small sounds keep opening ventilation shafts through the density. The music remains recognizably derived from Ambarchi’s material, but derivation never becomes dependence. Villalobos discovers enough possible relationships inside those original guitars to make the remix feel composed from the spaces between them.
The vinyl divides the work into two parts, but the uninterrupted digital version reveals how little the music depends upon conventional sectional boundaries. The side change is physical rather than dramatic, a pause imposed by the dimensions of the record rather than a conclusion written into the composition. Heard continuously, the piece behaves like a long corridor whose architecture changes so gradually that individual rooms cannot be marked with confidence. This makes the vinyl and digital editions slightly different conceptual objects. One asks the listener to interrupt the process, turn the disc and deliberately resume it. The other permits the transformation to continue without human intervention, making the gradual reorganization of rhythm even harder to locate.
The title Hubris becomes more curious after this act of surrender. Hubris ordinarily describes excessive confidence, the belief that one can exceed natural limits without consequence. Yet remixing requires an artist to give another person access to the work’s internal structure and accept that its identity may not survive intact. Ambarchi’s composition becomes less an untouchable statement than a field of possibilities. Villalobos responds with equal restraint, resisting the temptation to display superiority by making the original unrecognizable. Neither person wins the supposed contest printed between their names. The music succeeds because authorship becomes porous.
That porosity extends to genre. The source material can be heard as experimental guitar music, minimalism, warped funk, new wave or an abstract form of rock repetition. Villalobos draws it toward minimal techno, but the piece never settles completely inside club language. The guitars remain too materially strange, and the rhythmic structure remains too interested in microscopic uncertainty to become a straightforward tool. At the same time, calling it merely an experimental remix would ignore its bodily intelligence. It understands dancing not as a decorative response applied to intellectual sound, but as another method of analyzing structure. The body notices relationships the conscious mind may need several minutes to identify.
Hubris Variation ultimately reveals that a remix need not modernize, simplify or improve its source. It can function as an extended act of listening. Villalobos hears Ambarchi’s guitar figures not only as completed sounds but as instructions containing unrealized possibilities. He follows those instructions into a labyrinth of pulse, delay and harmonic residue, changing their scale until the listener can walk among components that once passed too quickly to inspect. The “variation” is not simply an alternate version of Hubris. It is evidence that the original piece contained more time than one recording could use.
Oren Ambarchi / Johan Berthling / Andreas Werliin - 2022 - Ghosted [24-48]
Drag City – DC838 405.63MB FLAC
Ghosted appears here in a 24-bit/48 kHz edition, the largest of three separate digital copies preserved in this archive. That greater numerical resolution does not automatically make it the definitive version, nor does file size provide a trustworthy measurement of musical truth. It does, however, give this copy a distinct identity and offers an appropriate reason to approach the album from another distance. Ghosted is music made for magnification. Its grooves seem broad and simple when heard casually, but closer attention reveals countless small negotiations taking place inside every repetition: the grain of fingers leaving a bass string, a drum stroke landing beside rather than directly upon the beat, or a guitar tone revolving slowly enough that its movement is felt before it is consciously recognized.
The album was recorded live in the studio, and much of its fascination comes from hearing human performance imitate the impossible steadiness normally associated with machines. Johan Berthling establishes bass figures that can sound looped, particularly on the electric-bass pattern of “II,” but the repetitions are being recreated in real time. Each return is therefore both the same musical instruction and a new physical event. Fingers must locate the note again, pressure must be renewed, and duration must be judged against whatever Andreas Werliin and Oren Ambarchi have just placed around it. A computer loop preserves one captured moment by repeating it. Berthling preserves the idea of the moment while allowing the body to generate it again and again.
Werliin’s drumming makes that distinction even more audible. He rarely occupies the obvious center of the rhythm with a standard rock pattern. Shakers, toms, rims and lightly struck drums outline the groove from its perimeter, dividing time into smaller shapes without destroying its larger circular motion. “II” can pass through its unusual meter with no sensation of stumbling because Werliin does not treat complexity as a puzzle that must be announced. He makes the rhythm bodily first and countable second. On “III,” his deeper toms create something close to a second melody beneath Berthling’s fixed line, subtly changing the bass phrase according to which drum answers it. Nothing in the notation would need to change for the emotional balance to keep shifting.
Ambarchi occupies a still stranger position. His instrument is recognizably electric guitar at its source, yet he avoids most of the gestures that usually establish a guitarist’s identity. Chords, riffs and conventional solos give way to sustained tones processed through rotating amplification, producing movement inside sound rather than movement from note to note. The guitar can resemble organ, bowed string, distant brass or an electrical glow whose point of origin has disappeared. High-resolution audio may encourage listeners to inspect those surfaces more closely, but the music’s mystery does not depend upon identifying every technical detail. The important event is perceptual: a tone appears stable, then reveals that it has been turning all along.
“I” offers the album’s warmest and most visibly acoustic environment. Christer Bothén’s donso n’goni meets Berthling’s double bass in a circular wooden pattern, allowing two plucked instruments to share the pulse without becoming interchangeable. Bothén’s long experience with West African music, including his work alongside Don Cherry, is carried into the session as practical knowledge rather than exotic decoration. His instrument does not hover outside the trio as a special guest color. It helps generate the music’s rhythmic center while Ambarchi sends thin light across the upper register and Werliin keeps the groove breathing. The piece feels open and spacious, but its calm is the result of four musicians continually making exact decisions.
The recording room becomes important because this apparently minimal music depends upon proportion. A bass tone must possess enough body to establish gravity without filling every available space. Percussion must remain detailed without shrinking into background ornament. Ambarchi’s processing must surround the acoustic instruments without erasing their wood, skin and string. Daniel Bengtson’s recording and the later mix by Ambarchi and Joe Talia preserve the trio as a shared environment rather than three isolated demonstrations of instrumental skill. A larger digital file may retain this edition’s information at greater resolution, but the deeper resolution was already present in the performance: three players leaving enough room for one another that tiny sounds could acquire structural importance.
“IV” brings the album’s close-listening experiment to its logical end by withdrawing the groove almost completely. After three pieces train the ear to search for change inside repetition, the final track asks it to search for rhythm inside near-stillness. Bass, guitar and percussion spread apart, leaving a dark residue where the clockwork had been. The preceding patterns remain active as memory, so the listener supplies an invisible pulse beneath the sounds that survive. This is the album’s most literal ghost. Nothing supernatural needs to enter the studio. Rhythm has inhabited the body long enough to continue after the musicians stop clearly stating it.
The three digital copies preserved here now form an accidental experiment in scale. One arrives as a compact archive, another as a standard-sized FLAC collection, and this one announces its 24/48 resolution through a file more than twice as large as the other lossless copy. They should not be ranked without examining their sources and listening carefully, because format labels alone cannot reveal mastering, provenance or audible quality. Their coexistence is more interesting than a premature winner. Each reflects a separate act of acquisition and preservation, and each may lead a future listener toward the same session by a different path.
Ghosted repeatedly demonstrates that attention creates difference where hurried perception reports sameness. The third copy extends that principle beyond the grooves themselves. This is still “I,” “II,” “III” and “IV,” still the same November 2018 gathering in Stockholm, yet it is also another package, another transmission and another opportunity to hear. The album has not changed, but the conditions surrounding the next encounter have. For music devoted to continuous minimal adjustment, that is not a clerical accident. It is almost a fifth composition.
Oren Ambarchi / Gunter Muller / Voice Crack - 2002 - Oystered
Audiosphere – AS06 221.36MB FLAC
An oyster is protected by a hard outer shell while continuously filtering the invisible material surrounding it. Oystered operates by a similar principle. Four musicians seal themselves inside a live electronic environment, admit signals, vibrations and disturbances from every direction, then gradually transform that incoming grit into something luminous and difficult to separate into individual sources. Oren Ambarchi’s guitar, Günter Müller’s percussion and MiniDisc system, and the cracked everyday electronics of Andy Guhl and Norbert Möslang rarely stand apart long enough to be identified with certainty. The quartet does not erase instrumental identity merely to create mystery. It listens for the region where one sound begins changing the apparent origin of another.
Voice Crack’s “cracked everyday electronics” were ordinary consumer devices pushed beyond their intended behavior. Radios, record players, dictating machines and other discarded circuitry became instruments once their cases were opened and their signals interrupted, redirected or allowed to interfere. This approach turns malfunction into a form of discovery. A device built to reproduce information begins generating events of its own, and the performer’s task changes from commanding a predictable instrument to negotiating with an unstable electrical situation. On Oystered, Guhl and Möslang create small flashes, whines, sputters and magnetic insects that can feel microscopic one moment and architectural the next. Their electronics do not decorate the music with futuristic noises. They establish an ecology in which every other sound must find a way to survive.
“Walking Oysters” begins with movement that never settles into an ordinary pulse. Müller’s percussion is present less as a beat than as soft pressure applied to the music’s underside, while his electronics place additional particles into the surrounding field. Ambarchi’s guitar stretches itself thin enough to pass among Voice Crack’s signals without arriving as a recognizable chord or solo. Sustained tones form temporary surfaces, then acquire cracks through which sharper frequencies enter. The title’s impossible image suits the piece. Oysters should remain fixed to their beds, yet this one walks because the entire environment around it is shifting. Motion does not require a road when the ground itself keeps changing position.
“Briefing Oysters” sounds like information being exchanged among organisms that have no need for language. Short electronic gestures pass across the stereo field, receive altered replies and disappear before any pattern becomes permanent. The quartet’s improvisation is unusually restrained, but restraint does not mean quiet politeness. Every participant leaves space because each understands how quickly a small frequency can enlarge when nothing crowds it. A click can reorganize the room. A faint drone can make the next burst of static seem violently bright. Ambarchi’s guitar often provides the most continuous material, yet even that continuity behaves like a current rather than a foundation. It passes through the others and returns carrying their electrical residue.
The nearly eight-minute “Grounding Oysters” brings the title’s marine creature into contact with another meaning of grounding. Electrical systems require a route through which unwanted current can safely return to earth, but this music never offers complete safety. Low tones and muted impacts provide temporary stability while stray signals keep testing the circuit’s boundaries. Müller’s background in percussion remains audible even when no conventional drum sound appears. He organizes density, timing and impact, knowing when one small event can carry more rhythmic authority than a repeated beat. The others respond by adjusting voltage rather than volume. Pressure rises through concentration, with the quartet gradually teaching the ear to hear electricity as something physical, textured and capable of weight.
The closing title piece is the longest opportunity to hear the group’s distinctions dissolve. Ambarchi’s drone can resemble a machine sustaining itself after its operator has left; Voice Crack’s circuitry can produce tones with the breath and fragility of acoustic instruments; Müller’s manipulated sounds can seem detached from any struck surface. The music becomes a single changing body whose internal organs are technologically incompatible but function together anyway. This is not fusion in the usual sense, where different languages are combined while their original identities remain visible. Oystered is closer to mutual contamination. Each musician’s material enters the others until guitar, percussion and electronics become qualities moving through the whole rather than objects owned by one player.
The album was recorded live, and its patience depends upon that shared present. Nobody could fully know which fragile signal would appear next or how long it would remain available. The quartet therefore composes by attention, making decisions quickly while allowing the results to unfold slowly. This creates a peculiar temporal depth. The music may seem almost stationary, yet it contains constant acts of recognition, acceptance and redirection. Four people are continually deciding whether to support a sound, interrupt it, imitate it, leave it isolated or allow it to vanish. Improvisation becomes less an expression of individual freedom than a temporary ethics of coexistence.
Oystered also captures Voice Crack near the end of the duo’s long life together. Guhl and Möslang had begun in free jazz three decades earlier, gradually abandoning conventional instruments until damaged electronics became both their method and their name. Ambarchi entered this mature language without attempting to modernize or overpower it, while Müller already shared a deep improvisational history with the Swiss pair. The recording therefore carries both familiarity and fresh interference. Three musicians knew one another’s electrical reflexes intimately; a fourth introduced guitar as another uncertain organism rather than a stabilizing guest voice.
That history gives the album’s shell another purpose. A shell does not merely protect what is alive inside it. After the animal has gone, it remains as evidence of growth, environment and duration. Oystered preserves one evening at Sydney’s Big Jesus Burger, but it also holds the final phase of an improvisational practice built from obsolete machines, physical presence and an extraordinary willingness to listen to accidents. The consumer electronics have aged, the group configurations have changed, and some of the original equipment may no longer function. The recording keeps filtering its surroundings anyway. Every room in which it plays supplies new air, new background noise and another listener prepared to discover whether the pearl is an object hidden inside the sound, or the attention slowly forming around it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)